Section 2. Process Summary: Summit, Workshops, Survey

Two graduate students infront of a computer workstation

The National Science Foundation (NSF) sponsored initiative on “Universal Skills for Geoscience Graduate Student Success in the Workforce” focused on what skills and competencies master’s and doctoral students in Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences need to be successful in future careers. The initiative builds on a previous undergraduate effort, published in the Vision and Change in the Geosciences: The Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education (Mosher and Keane, 2021), regarding what students need to be successful in the workplace and to discover how these translated to graduate geoscience education. The graduate effort covered the breadth of the geosciences and geoscience careers, including academia, whereas the undergraduate effort primarily, though not entirely, focused on Earth Sciences. For this reason, establishing a critical suite of concepts was not included in these discussions. Participants were predominantly, but not exclusively, from the U.S. and Canada.

The project goals were to:

  • Identify the skills and competencies that should be part of graduate geoscience education for doctoral and master’s students in Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences.
  • Investigate the best means of developing these skills and competencies in graduate geoscience programs nationally.
  • Work with Heads/Chairs and Graduate Program Directors on implementation strategies to develop the skills and competencies identified by the geoscience employers’ workshop and other studies.

In October 2018, a Geoscience Employer Workshop brought together 52 participants representing a broad spectrum of geoscience employers of doctoral and master’s students in the Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences. These industrial, non-profit and other organizations covered weather and climate, energy and natural resources, oceans and fisheries, environment, geology, reinsurance and hazards. Also represented were NASA, NOAA, federal labs and other government agencies, and research labs within universities and professional societies. The participants spent two days discussing and providing feedback to academia on the skills and competencies needed by doctoral and master’s students for the current and future workforce. Their discussions were informed by presentations derived from the results of the Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education (FUGE) initiative, the National Academy of Sciences report on Graduate STEM Education for the 21^st^ Century, and the Council of Graduate Schools report on Professional Development Shaping Effective Programs for STEM Graduate Students. The workshop format was similar to the previous FUGE Summits and workshops, where small working groups addressed a series of specific questions and presented a summary of their results to all participants for a group discussion. By the end of the workshop, geoscience employers had defined geoscience skills and competencies needed by master’s and doctoral graduates, discussed methods for developing these skills and competencies and the employers’ role in this endeavor, and the balance between preparing for the workforce, research, and more general educational goals. It is noteworthy that despite the broad differences in disciplines and employment sectors, there was strong agreement on the skills and competencies needed by graduate students in the Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences.

In May of 2019, a three-day Summit of academic leaders brought together 74 participants, primarily department heads, chairs and graduate program directors of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences programs, representing 59 doctoral granting and 5 masters’-only granting universities or colleges. Ten participants represented industry and professional societies. Participants received the same background information as the geoscience employers plus a summary of the results from the 2018 Geoscience Employers workshop. Additionally, there were three panels: two employer panels, one focused on skills and competencies needed to prepare graduate students for future careers in the geosciences, and the other on employer roles and expectations, plus a professional scientific society panel focused on their roles. The format for the rest of the summit was the same as for the geoscience employers’ workshop and previous FUGE summits and workshops. The participants discussed the input from geoscience employers and other studies on skills and competencies needed by doctoral and master’s students for the current and future workforce, methods for developing these skills and competencies, and the balance between preparing for the workforce, research, and general educational goals. The academic leaders in general agreed with the employers in terms of what skills and competencies graduating doctoral and master’s students have acquired and what they lacked. Additionally, participants discussed implementation strategies for integrating these skills and competencies into graduate programs and developed Action Plans for their institutions. Fifty-three institutional plans were submitted.

A 3-day workshop was also held at the Earth Educators Rendezvous in 2019 (44 participants; in-person) and in 2021 (61 participants; virtual) where we integrated the results of the graduate and undergraduate initiatives, and gained additional insights and feedback from department heads, chairs, and graduate program directors.

Progress reports on each Action Plan were requested in the fall of 2020 and of 2021 and spring of 2022. The onset of the COVID‑19 pandemic in the spring of 2020 had a significant impact on progress in implementing changes. However, by 2022 we had received reports from 30% of the action plans, and half of those programs submitted two reports, one to two years apart. In 2021, a subset of employers who participated in the 2018 Geoscience Employers workshop provided insights into what had changed since 2018, with the primary focus being the effects of the pandemic. In 2021 and 2022, employers were also contacted to find out what changes had occurred in the workplace that impacted the previous results, with seven employers providing substantial input.

In 2022, we held two workshops that were specifically designed for administrative leaders who could make and lead change, and the employers of doctoral and master’s students in Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, who are involved in making hiring decisions or setting priorities for their organizations. The specific objective of these events was to connect geoscience academic leaders and employers to encourage further dialogue about what skills and competencies graduate students needed to be successful in the future workforce regardless of their career path, and to discuss how graduate programs can effectively develop these skills and competencies for their students.

Our goal was to develop strategies for transformative changes in geoscience graduate education. Both workshops had working groups with both academics and employers, and at these workshops, the academics also participated as employers. The format was similar to the other events, though with several presentations: results of the 2018 Geoscience Employers workshop augmented by the employer updates on what had changed since 2018; the outcomes of 2019 Heads/Chairs/Graduate Program Directors Summit and implementation successes; and a summary of 2019 Heads/Chairs/Graduate Program Director Action Plan Reports. Discussions focused on similar questions as addressed at the earlier Summit and workshop events and explored what changes had taken place since 2018/2019. The May 2022 workshop had 43 participants comprising 23 academics and a somewhat different mix of 20 employers, including the World Bank, Smithsonian Institute, NASA, a space/geophysical research institute, state and federal government regulatory agencies, oil and gas, USGS hydrogeology, American Meteorological Society, and the National Association of State Boards of Geology (ASBOG). The August workshop had 33 participants, 19 academics and 14 various employers, including several types of consulting, reinsurance, oil/gas, construction, Google, and national labs. A couple of graduate students also attended the May and August workshops to provide student perspectives.

Overall, we received input from over 300 individuals, of which ~100 were geoscience employers, with essentially all types of geoscience employers represented.

The American Geosciences Institute (AGI) also conducted several surveys in support of the project. All surveys were conducted utilizing the LimeSurvey online platform hosted on AGI owned servers. No options for paper or phone responses were provided. Additionally, all communications soliciting responses to these surveys were directed to the identified chair or head of U.S. geoscience departments.

Through a subaward, AGI conducted a study of the structure of geoscience graduate programs. AGI sent survey requests to all 377 U.S. graduate degree granting geoscience departments as identified in the 2018 Directory of Geoscience Departments. The respondent on behalf of the department was delegated by the chair or head. Complete responses were received from 146 departments, giving the survey a response rate of 39%. Of those responding departments, 27% were terminal master’s programs. The results were then analyzed against the underlying framing of degree level and whether the degree programs were structured as a cohort or non-cohort. The complete analysis results are available on the project website https://graduate.americangeosciences.org.

AGI leveraged its support of activities from this project to relaunch its National Survey of Recent Geoscience Graduates Survey. This survey is sent to all departments for distribution to their graduating students at the bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral levels. The respondents were the graduating students. The two most recent iterations of the survey received 442 responses (2020–21) (212 were from master’s or doctoral graduates) and 519 responses (2021–22 (233 were from masters’ or doctoral graduates), representing an estimated 15% and 16% of graduate degree awardees, respectively. Both surveys utilized identical instruments for measuring employment, research experiences, and skills and concept exposure. The full results of the National Survey of Recent Geoscience Graduates are available on the AGI website (Keane et al., 2022; https://www.americangeosciences.org/static/files/GraduateSurvey2021.pdf).